Talk:Ulmus laevis

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2001:7D0:88FB:8080:9DA6:2FEA:237E:13E7 in topic Timber quality

File:Ulmus laevis twig.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Ulmus laevis twig.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Panorama ValAllier 1258JPG light.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Panorama ValAllier 1258JPG light.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deleted an external link edit

I have deleted this *Ecology of the European White Elm from external links as the link was broken and the publication is already linked to just above (EUFORGEN website).Ewa hermanowicz (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Timber quality edit

'Uses' section is rather laconic and pessimistic. There are sources that claim the timber is of great quality (hard, heavy, decorative) if dried properly (slowly) - link: [1]https://puuproffa.fi/puutieto-2-2/species/jalava-2/?lang=en

So what gives? Maybe an addition/redo of that section is in order? 2001:7D0:88FB:8080:9DA6:2FEA:237E:13E7 (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply