Talk:Tribeca Festival

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 86.235.59.247 in topic Recentism... split?

Recentism... split? edit

Even though this event is rather new (2002) having more than half of the article devoted to 2006 is problematic. I put the recentism tag but maybe we can agree to split part of the section into 2006 Tribeca Film Festival? gren グレン 00:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Go for it. The 2007 festival is coming up, and it would seem outdated to have the 2006 content sticking around in such a prominent fashion. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 19:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
@Grenavitar ww 86.235.59.247 (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Venue edit

What is the relationship of the Tribeca Cinema to the Film Festival? I remember it showed movies prior to 2002. Sylvain1972 (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I remember now - it used to be "The Screening Room." Sylvain1972 (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed the 2007 and 2008 links, because they did not work anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruvensky (talkcontribs) 07:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article needs updating edit

I have no expertise to expand this article but being "one of the most prominent film festivals in the world", and being held in Qatar in 2009, this article really needs some attention. 81.129.207.61 (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Premiere Films Incorrectly Listed edit

There are several films listed as being premiered during the inaugural festival, but were fact not even filmed until years later. Specifically: Spider-Man 3 (2007) & The Avengers (2012) Either both films have been included lacking any chronologic distinction from the earlier premieres, or the sectin/edit's author included the two films by mistake. Regardless, reference to both should be removed in order to absolve any confusion created by mismatched festival dates; Or alternately, with proper citation, follow the selections from the debut festival with examples premiered during later dates. Another possibility, given the proper source(s), would be the addition of a single table (or more depending on design and format) of films first shown as part of Tribeca, grouped by year of appearance, and sorted alphabetically (speaking of which, it seems about half the inaugural premieres included appear to be absent from the linked source at the end of the list. Someone find a proper citation or these should go. Source:[6] http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06115/684768-254.stm) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.56.65 (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply