Talk:Treaty of Margus

Add topic
Active discussions

Date of treatyEdit

Hi, the date added in my recent edit contradicts the date that had been there previously, but it is referenced (I changed it from 443 to 435). The two references that were used before I added two new references may back-up the date used before my edit, but I don't have access to them, so can not be sure. It seems that there may have been a series of treaties in quick succession, and these may be causing the confusion.

Sources asserting 435:

This source suggests that there was indeed a 443 treaty, however, it does not call it the Treaty of Margus.

Cheers, Darigan (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


The Huns article claims the Romans failed to pay tribute, so does it make sense to say Attila breached it first in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:D08D:0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)