Talk:Training
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Training article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled edit
We should add something about Andragogy here...
Split section on parochial schools edit
The section on parochial schools is in the topic of education, not training, and would fit better in an article on education. It may already be there, making this one redundant. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical context? edit
I think this article could benefit from reviewing the historical development of the training industry between the late 1800s and today.
e.g. Dale Carnegie built a training business starting in 1912.
Lauchlanmack (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
e.g. https://msu.edu/~sleightd/trainhst.html Lauchlanmack (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
The training pictogram should be moved to a different location within the article edit
In my opinion, I strongly believe that the training pictogram should be moved to the start of the article before the text reaches the other sections of the article as I feel that the pictogram is in an inappropriate place at present in the 'See also' section of the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Can you provide some logical reasoning to support your opinion? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
My edits rejected edit
Hi,
I edited this page, on the section of "Occupational skills training" and it was rejected by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie
I inserted a sentence, and provided a reference from an accredited scientific journal from a literature review. I read the page of the editor, and it seems this type of unprofessional censoring is a norm from this editor. I have been a fan of Wikipedia for over a decade and donated to Wikipedia many times. Now, is this immediate rejection a new policy? Who decided that MrOllie should be censoring new inputs?
Please provide me with a sound reason, and bring my trust to Wikipedia.
Doozandeh (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) User: Zarathustra55
- @Zarathustra55: I have moved your post here, this talk page is the place to try to seek consensus for your changes. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 15:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
What training have you completed since starting to be a social worker edit
Life orientation 2C0F:F528:40:618:2D85:879E:495A:644A (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)