This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
I really don't think there is any need to merge these articles. One is about a lighthouse, the other one is about an island, and notably on the ecological restoration of it. These two subjects have nothing in common. Dick Bos (talk) 05:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Lighthouse articles are usually fairly specialised, with their own infoboxes, and often history related to maritime disasters and things other than the island itself; I think that they can usually stand on their own. If the island on which a lighthouse is situated is so insignificant that there is nothing much to say about it (which is certainly not the case here), then it does not need a separate article. Maias (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Opposed as there is no consensus here or at the receiving article. Removed tag. Ingolfson (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
