Talk:The Italian Job

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Khamba Tendal in topic Box Office

Aborted sequel edit

On The Jonathan Ross Show on 16 January 2016, Michael Caine claimed that there was a sequel well into planning which saw the coach saved by burning off the fuel which re-balanced the bus allowing the crew to get off, which in turn caused the coach and the gold to fall into the valley where it was picked up by the local mafia. The sequel would then see the crew pursue the mafia across France to retrieve their haul. The potential film - potentially entitled The French Job - was being promoted in Hollywood before a disagreement about the promotion led to the project being canned (according to Caine). Is there anything solid about this out there? There is nothing in the article. danno_uk 21:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Italian Job. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Spoiler in first paragraph! edit

This page looks terribly edited... Considering the immense fame of the film, references are missing and content layout/ordering is thoughtless. 82.2.100.6 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

2003 remake edit

Although it bears the same title to the orginal 1969 farce comedy..the plot seems more closer to the 1967 John Wayne-Kirk Douglas Movie The War Wagon in which a rancher and associates take revenge on a corrupt businessman who had stolen a ranch and harresed a local Inidan tribe. 72.49.135.236 (talk) 14:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Box Office edit

The box office figure in the infobox relates solely to two UK re-releases (quite possibly one-screen-only) in 2019 and 2020, and is therefore the result of either ignorance or vandalism, though inevitably you find it repeated all over the Web 'because it's on Wiki'. The film is believed to have made $10m from its first run in 1969 (equivalent to at least $200m now) on a $3m budget, despite its failure in the US due, in Michael Caine's opinion, to an extremely misjudged poster campaign. Note that by 1999 Paramount, by dint of 'creative accounting', were still claiming that the film had made a loss. Among other things they were still claiming compound interest, over 30 years, on the money they put into the production, even though it had long been earned back. American film accountants do this kind of thing to avoid any admission of profit, but it is, obviously, a racket. Paramount also claimed that Forrest Gump made a loss, even though it cost $55m and made $675m.

https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/the-italian-job-how-studio-accounting-said-it-lost-money/

Khamba Tendal (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply