Talk:Terraria/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 14:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Tarlby (talk · contribs) 15:53, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Tarlby

I remember playing this game a lot. It was pretty fun. Expect me to begin soon! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 15:53, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• Earwig catches [1] an 88.9% chance for a copyvio from this website [2], though I checked the oldest archive from the Wayback Machine [3] and compared it to this permadiff. It's just a mirror of Wikipedia, so it's nothing to worry about.

• "The development began in January 2011..." ---> "Development began in January 2011..."
  •  Done

Gameplay

• The articles phases out of using the Oxford comma multiple times, i.e the lead and first sentence for this section.
  •  Done If I skipped something, please tell me.
• "NPCs prefer to reside in certain biomes and with certain NPCs, and will raise..." Brainfart
  •  Done
• "...NPCs, and will raise or lower their prices and sell special items depending on if they are sufficiently happy." How do players make sure NPCs are sufficiently happy?
  •  Done
• "And additional ones, such as Recipe Browser, Veinminer, and Fargo's Mutant Mod, aim to improve quality of life..." ---> "Additional ones, such as Recipe Browser, Veinminer, and Fargo's Mutant Mod, aim to improve quality of life..." I would link quality of life to Glossary of video game terms#quality of life.
  •  Done

Development and release

• Looks good.

Reception

• Looks good.

Sequels

• Looks good.

Sourcing

I plan to check these refs (I will update if you remove or add any):

2 Good

3

• Couldn't find the date of publication in the non-archived link (or maybe I'm just blind) so I looked at the archive version. It says the article was published "11/09/2012" which I assume is in dmy format, correct?
  • Correct. In the URL, it is also listed in the YMD format.

8

9 All good

10

11

12

14

15 All good

17

19

20

22

24

25

27

28

29

31

33

34

37

39

40

42

43

46

47

49

52

59

60

61 All good

63

65

66

67

70

71

72

73

75

76

77

88

89

90

93

96 All good

97

• I don't see where the author compliments the game's replayability.
  • Turns out, though, Terraria ($4.99) has one hell of a deep well, and has had me coming back for more on more occasions than I can count.

100

101

102

105

106

109

113 All good

Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

The spotchecks are finished now. I am pleasently surprised at the complete lack of any major problems here. Good job! If you ever plan on bringing this to FAC, I would reccomend making the prose more engaging. A lot of the sentences, especially in the development and receptions sections, follow this basic formula: "He developed this. This update was announced. That was released on (insert date)", or, "Someone thought that. This guy commended this. Some people criticised that."

This doesn't feel that engaging to read and ended up making me a little bored, so that's something you can fix later on. I'll be passing this now. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:49, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.