Talk:Ted Alford

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ted Alford/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Going to take a look at this article. MWright96 (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

BC Lions edit

  • "He finished the season as the second most-productive Lions receiver with 721 receiving yards, leading the Lions to nominate Alford for the league-wide Most Outstanding Rookie award." - repetition of the world Lions

Edmondton Eskimos edit

  • "which required a full season of rehab." - rehabilitation
  • "but he wasn't offered a contract." - was not

Hamilton Tiger-Cats edit

  • "Alford made his debut with the Ticats on August 8, 1997" - Tiger-Cats

2001 season edit

  • "36–35 upset of the Calgary Stampeders" - 36-35 upset over the Calgary Stampeders

Calgary Stampeders edit

  • "he injured his hamstring and didn't return to the active roster for the rest of the season." - did not

References edit

On hold until all the points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • @MWright96: I believe everything has been addressed. Note that I reworded the one point under the Stampeders section a bit differently than you suggested, but it still addresses your concern. ~ Rob13Talk 19:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
    • Thank you for your quick response. GA class has been achieved. MWright96 (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply