This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Re: this - While anybody's scholarly review is a valid source of facts about the reviewed work, IMO the judgements are of encyclopedic value only when they come from peers or well recognized scholars in the area. The latter ones must either have a wikipedia article or described as such in RS (and the latter fact must accompany the judgement, so that nobody asks WTF is this Jacek Skrzyszyński to read his judgement). Staszek Lem (talk) 17:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
You wrote Peter Butko is a scholar. Who the heck is he? What makes his opinion on Lem important? Did you try to find out this before reverting me? Butko is Ph.D in physich and biophysics in Slovakia and Hungary. Therefore he has no say in literary criticism. Your revert will reverted as an edit done without due diligence, unless you provide proof that Butko is an expert in literature. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
