Talk:Sprain Brook Parkway/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Seabuckthorn in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 17:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Nominator: Mitch32(The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn  17:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

1: Well-written

Check for WP:LEAD:  

  1. Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:     Done
  2. Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):     Done
  3. Check for Introductory text:     Done
    • Lead should provide an accessible overview with Relative emphasis (MOS:INTRO). The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article. Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the body.  
    • "New York's Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) refers to it internally as New York State Route 987F (NY 987F), an unsigned reference route." (not in body  )
    • Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):     Done
      • Major Point 1: Route description "It begins at an interchange with the Bronx River Parkway … it merges into the Taconic State Parkway." (not a concise summary of the History section  )
      • Major Point 2: History "The Sprain Brook was first proposed in the early 1920s … 1979, at which time, all maintenance of the Sprain Brook Parkway was turned over to NYSDOT." (not a concise summary of the History section  )
      • Major Point 2.1: Original proposal "The Sprain Brook was first proposed in the early 1920s … The Sprain Brook proposal sat on the table until 1949" (summarised well in the lead  )
      • Major Point 2.2: Revival "The Sprain Brook proposal sat on the table until 1949, when the State Council of Parks, run by Robert Moses to ease congestion on the Bronx River Parkway." (not a concise summary of the Revival section  )
      • Major Point 2.3: "Route A" "After a controversial right-of-way acquisition … its "Route A" alternative began in 1958" (not a concise summary of the Route A section  )
      • Major Point 2.4: Construction "After being constructed to I-287 (the Cross Westchester Expressway) in November 1969, the parkway did not have the stretch from the interstate to the Hawthorne Circle." (not a concise summary of the Construction section  )
      • Major Point 2.5: Completion "Due to multiple delays by the state of New York, and after heavy pressure from industry … 1979, at which time, all maintenance of the Sprain Brook Parkway was turned over to NYSDOT." (summarised well in the lead  )
    • Check for Relative emphasis:     Done
      • Major Point 1: Route description "It begins at an interchange with the Bronx River Parkway … it merges into the Taconic State Parkway." (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2: History "The Sprain Brook was first proposed in the early 1920s … 1979, at which time, all maintenance of the Sprain Brook Parkway was turned over to NYSDOT." (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2.1: Original proposal "The Sprain Brook was first proposed in the early 1920s … The Sprain Brook proposal sat on the table until 1949" (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2.2: Revival "The Sprain Brook proposal sat on the table until 1949, when the State Council of Parks, run by Robert Moses to ease congestion on the Bronx River Parkway." (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2.3: "Route A" "After a controversial right-of-way acquisition … its "Route A" alternative began in 1958" (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2.4: Construction "After being constructed to I-287 (the Cross Westchester Expressway) in November 1969, the parkway did not have the stretch from the interstate to the Hawthorne Circle." (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body  )
      • Major Point 2.5: Completion "Due to multiple delays by the state of New York, and after heavy pressure from industry … 1979, at which time, all maintenance of the Sprain Brook Parkway was turned over to NYSDOT." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body  )
    • Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):     Done
      • Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):     Done
        • The Sprain Brook Parkway (also known as The Sprain) is a 12.65-mile (20.36 km) long north–south parkway in Westchester County, New York, United States.
      • Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):     Done
      • Check for Proper names and titles:     Done
      • Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN):   None
      • Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG):   None
      • Check for Pronunciation:   None
      • Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):     Done
      • Check for Biographies:   NA
      • Check for Organisms:   NA
  4. Check for Biographies of living persons:   NA
  5. Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):     Done
    • Check for Non-English titles:  
    • Check for Usage in first sentence:  
    • Check for Separate section usage:  
  6. Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):     Done
  7. Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER):   None
  Done

Check for WP:LAYOUT:     Done

  1. Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.     Done
    • Check for Headings and sections:     Done
    • Check for Section templates and summary style:     Done
    • Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):     Done
  2. Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):     Done
    • Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):     Done
    • Check for Works or publications:     Done
    • Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO):     Done
    • Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):     Done
    • Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER):   None
    • Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL):     Done
    • Check for Links to sister projects:     Done
    • Check for Navigation templates:     Done
  3. Check for Formatting:     Done
    • Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):     Done
    • Check for Links:     Done
    • Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):     Done
WP:WTW:  
  Done

Check for WP:WTW:     Done

  1. Check for Words that may introduce bias:     Done
    • Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):     Done
    • Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):     Done
    • Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):     Done
    • Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):     Done
    • Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):     Done
    • Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):     Done
  2. Check for Expressions that lack precision:     Done
    • Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):     Done
    • Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):     Done
    • Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):     Done
    • Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA):   None
  3. Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):     Done

Check for WP:MOSFICT:     Done

  1. Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):     Done
    • Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):     Done
    • Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):     Done
  Done


2: Verifiable with no original research

WP:RS:  
  Done

Check for WP:RS:     Done

Cross-checked with other FAs: M-185 (Michigan highway), New York State Route 28N, New York State Route 319, New York State Route 174, New York State Route 32, Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

  1. Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING):   (not contentious)   Done
    • Is it contentious?:   No
    • Does the ref indeed support the material?:  
  2. Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):     Done
    • Who is the author?:  
    • Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:  
    • What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:  
    • What else has the author published?:  
    • Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:  
  3. Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):     Done
  4. Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):  
  Done

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:     Done

  1. Check for Direct quotations:     Done
  2. Check for Likely to be challenged:     Done
  3. Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP):   NA
WP:NOR:  
  Done
  1. Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):     Done
  2. Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):     Done
  3. Check for original images (WP:OI):     Done


3: Broad in its coverage

  Done

Cross-checked with other FAs: M-185 (Michigan highway), New York State Route 28N, New York State Route 319, New York State Route 174, New York State Route 32, Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

  1. Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:  
    1. Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:  
    2. Check for Out of scope:  
  2. Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:  
    1. Check for All material that is notable is covered:  
    2. Check for All material that is referenced is covered:  
    3. Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:  
    4. Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:  
    5. Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):  
b. Focused:  
  Done
  1. Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):  
  2. Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):  


4: Neutral

  Done

4. Fair representation without bias:     Done

  1. Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):     Done
  2. Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):     Done
  3. Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):     Done
  4. Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):     Done
  5. Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):     Done
  6. Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):     Done
  7. Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):     Done
  8. Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):     Done
  9. Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):     Done
  10. Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):     Done
  11. Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):     Done
  12. Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI):   None
  13. Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV):   None


5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:   Yes

6: Images   Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license)

Images:  
  Done

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:     Done

  1. Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):     Done
  2. Check for copyright status:     Done
  3. Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):   None
  4. Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):   NA

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:     Done

  1. Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):     Done
  2. Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):     Done
  3. Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):     Done


As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:  

  • The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give relative emphasis.


This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best,   --Seabuckthorn  04:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Give me a couple days. Been a busy weekend.Mitch32(The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.) 05:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
There all done. Mitch32(The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.) 22:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks   --Seabuckthorn  07:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Promoting the article to GA status.   --Seabuckthorn  07:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply