Talk:Short twentieth century
Latest comment: 16 years ago by 24.86.144.101 in topic must wikipedia be a tosh repositary?
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This redirect is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
American Empire edit
POV here: the term "Soviet Empire" can't be used in normal articles, as can't be used "American Empire".
- So fix it. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 11:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
must wikipedia be a tosh repositary? edit
You know, I read this, and think that some historians think a lot of weird stuff, but we don't have to promote it!
Given the jolt that the 21st century began with in 2001, the 20th century fits perfectly within it's natural confines, reckonest I.
80.229.242.179 18:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't promoting it, just identifying it.Eric Hobsbwam is an incredibly influential historian as well. Furthermore, to define 2001 as the start of "The (x) 21st Century" is silly, seeing as how if 2001 were given as said starting date, we'd only be six years in :p24.86.144.101 (talk) 10:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)