Talk:Shalamar

Proposed Rewrite

This article is sketchy, bitty, poorly organised and not particularly informative to readers who don't already know their Shalamar history. The basics are there, but it needs a complete and expanded rewrite, i.e. the group's most successful period (1979-1983 - the Daniel/Hewett/Watley years) is passed over in one four-line paragraph with some classic albums not even mentioned: what little there is seems to be written from a United Kingdom perspective as nothing whatsoever is said about the group's profile in the USA during this time.

I'm up for a rewrite, perhaps splitting the Career section into something along the lines of:

1. Early Days (1977-78)
   
2. The Daniel/Hewett/Watley Years (1979-1983)
   
3. The Later Years & Decline (1984-1990)
   
4. After Shalamar (1991-present)
   

I'll give it a week (until 4 July 2009) to see if anybody has any comments or suggestions. Thanks.Draggleduck (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I will be up for that. Let's see your re-write

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/shalamar-mn0000790833/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Trademark

I know a lot of Jody Watley fans are convinced that she owns Shalamar just because she registered a trademark but she does not!! If you believe that it is because you dont understand trademark law. Stop vandalising this page with your pro-Jody edits. This is a fact - Howard Hewett, Jeffrey Daniel and Carolyn Griffey have been Shalamar continuously since 2003. Their usage of the name takes priority over Jody's registration - FACT!! So please stop insisting that Jody Watley and her two unknowns are now Shalamar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.80.217.110 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Angry comments from anonymous users don't tend to get a lot of respect in Wiki world. Your use of capital letters to exclaim your anger won't really get you anywhere either. If you have something genuine to add why not try rational statement of your arguments, will get you further. Status4 (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I only saw one word written in caps and it did not come across as anger to me. I agree with the first author. Shalamar and Shalamar Reloaded are two different bands. User 12191 (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Did Jody acquire trademark? No

Jody Watley says that she purchased the rights to the "Shalamar" name. She did not. She merely registered the trademark fraudulently. She has no rights to the name so could people stop adding in sections on "Shalamar Overloaded"

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shalamar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140505110715/http://www.shalamaronline.com/2013/07/jeffrey-daniel-spills-beans-on-shalamar.html to http://www.shalamaronline.com/2013/07/jeffrey-daniel-spills-beans-on-shalamar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)