Talk:Sexual abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago

Requested move 29 November 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


– For consistency with (arch)diocesan article titles and freshly-minted consistency of titles within this large category. Elizium23 (talk) 11:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom. No such user (talk) 13:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, existing article names are all over the place. –Zfish118talk 17:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment I am okay with consistency, but I would tweak the proposed names to reduce how long they are. I would drop the "Roman Catholic" part, leaving them as "Sexual abuse scandal in the Diocese of ..." (and the "Archdiocese" counterpart). If there is another diocese with the same name that is not Catholic and that also has a sexual abuse scandal article, then adding "Catholic" to the titles of the corresponding articles, but I would do that just by adding a parenthetical "(Catholic)" and "(<other church name>)" as is done, generally, for disambiguation of article titles. Redirects with the longer names might still be created if it is believed to be helpful. — Archer1234 (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.