This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Per the RFC on station leads, the consensus is to include the word "station" in the introductory mention. If it makes the rest of the sentence wonky, we can reword it, but I don't think that's true here; at any rate "Saint-Lambert station is a railway station" is different from "Saint-Lambert station is a station". The edit also makes the first sentence excessively long, and introduced some errors.--Cúchullaint/c 04:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
There you go! Just station without redundancy. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
