Requested move 29 April 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply



S-X (producer)S-X – In 2017, S-X branched out into being a recording artist/singer, so he is no longer just a record producer, and the former is now his primary career - he releases his own artist projects more than he does record production nowadays). For these reasons, I think that the article for "S-X (producer)" should be moved to "S-X" as one can no longer label S-X as just a producer. Timwikisidemen (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not aware of any sources that refer to it as "S-X", rather than "Regulation S-X". A hatnote could be added just in case. 162 etc. (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, whilst I think the nom rationale for ptopic is rather flimsy (I would use (musician) in this situation otherwise), I think that ultimately this name refers to the musician only, so there is no real reason for him not to be the primary topic of S-X. Lazz_R 12:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, I see no other usage of "S-X" on Wikipedia for a article page, therefore the name of "S-X" should surely be used to refer to the musician as the main topic given that fact. Sluggor (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.