Russo-Circassian War is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Text and/or other creative content from Seferbiy Zaneqo was copied or moved into Russo-Circassian War on 15 March 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Text and/or other creative content from Circassian genocide was copied or moved into Russo-Circassian War on 15 March 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I ask the administration to pay attention to the actions of some participants, which add absolutely absurd data contradicting the sources, the article should be closed for edits Dushnilkin (talk) 11:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Please explain why you think that remilitari.com is a reliable source. It does not provide scholarly sources to the numbers it gives, therefore these numbers are impossible to reliably verify. - Altenmann>talk 16:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
P.S. The website says "Members of this society and affiliates of the De Re Militari Social Network may be any person who previously requests it from the Administrator or Owner of the electronic Social Network as indicated on the Social Network Server page, as well as in the of this website intended for this purpose." This means this society does not require any scholarly credentials from he contributors, hence it cannot be possibly a reliable source. Altenmann>talk 16:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Altenmann. Also, it would be prudent for editwarring parties to start using the article talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Malik wrote in edit summary:
Remilitari.com is recognized as a reliable source by numerous academic institutions, historians, and researchers. Its credibility stems from thorough research, citation of primary sources, and peer-reviewed content. Furthermore, its commitment to factual accuracy and unbiased reporting solidifies its status as a reputable source for historical information. The source also provides the Circassian casualties, but you don’t change nothing on the Circassian side. It just shows your ego and hypocrisy
Please show me a single "citation of primary sources, and peer-reviewed content", or at the very least author in the page you cited, so that the credibilitary of the page may be evaluated. - Altenmann>talk 01:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.svg)
