Talk:Rose (color)

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 18:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

The colour magenta

At the very base of the page, under the "shades of violet section" I think the colour magenta has been given the wrong colour tab - it is certainly a different colour than the magenta under the "shades of red" and "shades of pink" sections, I think that it may be fuschia, rather than magenta. I'm not really sure how to fix it, or if I'm right... Does anyone else see a difference? ::

The trouble is that there are several magentas. Fuchsia is also known as magenta or "electric magenta". Whatever set of editors did the shades templates wasn't always being consistent. Here's a snippet of the shades of red to illustrate the alt names and numbers (the first four on the second row).

|-
| width="5%" style="font-size:90%;" | [[Fuchsia (color)|Fuchsia]]
| width="5%" style="font-size:90%;" | [[Girlsnberry]]
| width="5%" style="font-size:90%;" | [[Fuchsia (color)|Hollywood Cerise]]
| width="5%" style="font-size:90%;" | [[Magenta]]

|-
|style="background:#FF00FF; "| <!-- Electric Magenta (Fuchsia) -->
|style="background:#D15C5C; "| <!-- Girlsnberry -->
|style="background:#F400A1; "| <!-- Hollywood Cerise   -->
|style="background:#FF0090; "| <!-- Process (Printer's) Magenta -->

Go to template:Shades of pink or template:Shades of violet and edit to see the others. It's not obvious what would be the right fix. Dicklyon 00:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Problem with "Japanese pink"

On the page Pink there is the link to this article to the section name "Japanese Pink", but this article has not got such section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomaszHolband (talk • contribs) 17:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Same thing with "American Rose". There is a link to this article from the Shades of Red page but there's no entry here.MultK (talk) 13:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Use of an image

The first thing to notice on this page is how the image breaks the layout. Contents-box appears on the right hand side an looks abrupt. Is the image needed at all to convey the idea of a color? Most color-pages work fine without a tangible picture to the origin of the word. There could be a link to a wikipedia article about roses or history of color or whatever. I suggest getting rid of the image for the sake of layout. RedJimi (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Color icon pink.svg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Color icon pink.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Color icon pink.svg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Versailles bedroom.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Versailles bedroom.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Versailles bedroom.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Possible removal from list

Entries in List of colors: A–F contained links to this page.

The entries are :

• Classic rose

Entries in List of colors: G–M contained links to this page.

• Light Thulian pink

Entries in List of colors: N–Z contained links to this page.

The entries are :

• Rose garnet
• Rose gold
• Rose quartz pink
• Turkish rose

I don't see any evidence that these colors are discussed in this article and plan to delete them from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries

If someone decides that these colors should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

"American Beauty (color)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect American Beauty (color) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 22#American Beauty (color) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

"Bazaar (color)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bazaar (color) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Bazaar (color) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:36, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

"Rosewood (color)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rosewood (color) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Rosewood (color) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

"Rose quartz (color)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rose quartz (color) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Rose quartz (color) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)