Talk:Romanization of Khmer

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Low‑importance

Romanization of Khmer is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

This article is looking great Dara - well done. Cheers, Paxse 18:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thhis article still needs a loot of improvement, I wouldn't even classify it as a C-class article. --Dara (talk) 19:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Official Romanization? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I guess I've been under a rock for too long, but I've never read about an official romanization before...any more details? Otherwise I'm removing the offical romanization part as it makes no sense, doesn't even link or give a source or details much into it. --Dara (talk) 19:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

It seems like this so-called 'Teesam' romanization was added by very clever spam bots. I've removed them as I can find no source to them. --Dara (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Teesam romanizations does not exist.--110.49.226.164 (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

What a rip edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems like the romanization section of this page <http://ethnomed.org/culture/cambodian/khmer-language> is a total rip off of this Wikipedia article but doesn't even bother referencing Wikipedia. If it was written in 2008, then I'm sure that author had to come here first while googling 'Khmer romanizations' up in addition to the other sites in it's references section. I must point out though, it is more nicely worded than this the Wikipedia article. I know discussions like these are discouraged, but it's sad to see how people do not like referencing Wikipedia due to academic stigmas. --Dara (talk) 19:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic