Talk:River Works station

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:River Works station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • "to General Electric Aviation employees" isn't the company called "GE Aviation"?
    •   Done
  • "MassDOT, " expand before using this.
    •   Done
  • Lynn station is linked, but nothing for West Lynn?
    •  ? I'm not sure what you mean by this. Where?
  • "freight sidings" link?
    •   Done
  • "grade crossing" link?
    •   Done
  • "in 1837. By 1852" bit repetitive.
    •   Done Reworded.
  • You have several bold names, like G.E. Works but they don't all exist as redirects back to this article.
    •   Done Redirects created.
  • "Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad" it was "and" in the lead.
    •   Done
  • "railroad.[21][14]:77 " order.
    •   Done
  • "The River Works plant" overlinked.
    •   Done
  • "1952.[30][23][31]" order.
    •   Done
  • "timetables.[34][35][36][37] " likewise.
    • Those appear to already be in order.
  • "seven daily inbound boardings in 1983, and 27 in 2018" 7/27 or seven/twenty-seven.
    •   Done
  • Is that reference really page 0?
    • It's the inside front cover, what would be page 0 given the existing pagination. I can't think of a better way to indicate that with {{rp}}.
  • "schedules based on existing Saturday schedules were in effect from March 16 to June 23, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These schedules" schedules/schedules/schedules...
    •   Done Reworded.
  • "July 1, 2020–June 30, 2021" spaced en-dash.
    •   Done
  • "made accessible, with"
    •  ? Not sure what change you're suggesting here.
  • "with MassDOT in" again, spell it out.
    •   Done
  • Ref 46 could use an endash not a hyphen.
    •   Done

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the detailed review! I've addressed most of your comments, with clarification needed on a few. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I looked at the ?'s and can't see any problems! Promoting. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Looks good to me. New enough, long enough, well-written, well-sourced, QPQ is done, no copyvios, and hook is cited. jp×g 22:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ALT0 to T:DYK/P4