Talk:ROWE

Removed a whole bunch of the cons that had no basis for being there. Nonsense items that had no citations to evidence supporting them and I suspect were put there by someone who is against a ROWE environment.

Robertstinnett (talk) 14:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

It would have helped if you had left information countering the negative instead of going mad with the delete key, because I came here looking to see if what David Whatley said on Slashdot made any sense. This article is full of nothing. And since David Whatley has not countered any of the criticisms launched in his direction, I have to conclude that ROWE is just management snake-oil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.128.195 (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

What *is* ROWE?

I'm still not enlightened. How about an example of a the KPIs/measures for a couple of staff from Best Buy? Without understand what the metrics are, it's a bit hard to understand how a ROWE really works. All the articles I can Google say the same thing "ROWE = results instead of hours" but don't actually explain how it works in any concrete way. 60.224.179.154 (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

It's has a lot to do with intrinsic motivation, I googled ROWE from a TED Talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_on_motivation.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.252.221.41 (talk) 02:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on ROWE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090514075744/http://www.businessweek.com:80/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100128101430/http://www.businessweek.com:80/careers/managementiq/archives/2009/09/gap_to_employee.html to http://www.businessweek.com/careers/managementiq/archives/2009/09/gap_to_employee.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130212241/http://gorowe.com:80/know-rowe/rowe-approved-companies/ to http://gorowe.com/know-rowe/rowe-approved-companies/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160120195040/http://www.businesskernel.org to http://www.businesskernel.org
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203005307/http://www.startribune.com:80/lifestyle/19387009.html?page=1&c=y to http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/19387009.html?page=1&c=y
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080606000358/http://wcco.com:80/local/work.sucks.rowe.2.738989.html to http://wcco.com/local/work.sucks.rowe.2.738989.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160120195040/http://www.businesskernel.org/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5 to http://www.businesskernel.org/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018045252/http://money.cnn.com:80/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/03/01/toc.html to http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/03/01/toc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)