Talk:Quetta District

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Quetta District

Copyright violation? edit

Some of this seems to be a copyright violation from a 2002 book - see this. Check the text beginning "In the early seventeenth century, a Pashtun from North India ..." - it's word for word. What next? DBaK (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


Quetta is now a city district. The map in the page is from the old district --79.159.174.25 (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quetta District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation reverted edit

Hi Uanfala, I wrongly fixed the disambiguation. However, on being reverted, I found that the said 'Khilji' might be Ghilji. They ruled around the same time. I am just helping my bit to clear the disambiguation, but only in a correct manner. - Jn045 (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, Ghilji looks appropriate. – Uanfala (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Quetta District edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Quetta District's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2017census":

  • From Kohlu District: "District Wise Results / Tables (Census - 2017)". www.pbscensus.gov.pk. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
  • From Sujawal District: "District-wise Tables - Census 2017 Final Results". pbs.gov.pk. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 04:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply