Talk:Quality of life (healthcare)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Quality of life was copied or moved into Quality of life (healthcare) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Second life?? edit
Surely its inappropriate to write about a computer game and a popular movie in this article, with a photo as well - irrelevant drivel that ought to be cut out. 92.15.31.212 (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality of life and pelvic organ prolapse edit
- 10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9
- Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ and Merry Christmas 21:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: UCSF SOM Inquiry In Action-- Wikipedia Editing 2022 edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 August 2022 and 20 September 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kreyes2, Heroap, Pinkstethoscope (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kwallabear, Iadnek.
— Assignment last updated by Kwallabear (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Special Considerations in Palliative Care: This section was very informative. The content seems sufficiently cited and all the relevant points are addressed. I appreciate the neutral stance that you took on a topic that is still evolving through research. Also, thank you for making sure all of the citation links work in this section. My only recommendation is to cut down on the run on sentences/phrases. Specifically, "This can affect the measurement of HRQoL as, oftentimes, patients change the way they respond to questionnaires which results in HRQoL staying the same of even improving as their physical condition worsens," is a bit difficult to understand. Overall, great work! Iadnek (talk) 03:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Ethics and Importance Edits edit
Importance: I love how detailed you were with your explanation. Including the specific details from clinical research is really helpful. You also mention the phrase "quality of life" a lot, which fits in really well with the content of the article.
Ethics: You bring a nuanced insight to the section. You discuss the advantages and disadvantages well, and you do a good job at informing people on why it can be difficult to assess quality of life domains using single metrics. One thing I'd change is to break up your sentences to make them a little easier to understand. Kwallabear (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)