Talk:Poaching

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fourwomen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nsummerle. Peer reviewers: Aleyba.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Elephant walks

User:Kcroes, your recent changes mention the walks two times but do not explain what is the special thing about them. Think we could refer more to ivory / elephant poaching but I didnt understand what you want to express. Polentarion Talk 21:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

The "walks" represent the heart of Jim Nyamu's efforts to draw attention to the problem of elephant poaching and the illegal trade in ivory. Nyamu is known in the elephant community for his walks; it's sort of his trademark approach. He's walked in many countries and has been joined by local dignitaries, activists, and citizens in general. During these walks, he's often invited to speak at various events, and receives local media coverage wherever he goes. I'm open to expanding this description here or elsewhere on Wikipedia where he is mentioned (poaching, ivory, ivory trade, elephants, etc.). I'm not an experienced contributor to Wikipedia, so would welcome your suggestions as to remedial actions or next steps. Thanks for your interest.Kcroes (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Less is more. I reduced the links to one and added a third party source. Polentarion Talk 23:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks. Kcroes (talk) 23:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome. Just try to refer to third party sources. I think the addition is warranted now. Polentarion Talk 11:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Species affected by poaching / Split proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

@Bamyers99:: Thnx for the recovery. I did not intend it, think it was a network issue, but the article actually looked better. There is so much content now in that species section, it warrants a separate list. What do you think? Polentarion Talk 19:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Polentarion: Based on the Wikipedia:Splitting size guidelines, it probably should be split. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Bamyers99: Thnx for the quick reply. Done it! Polentarion Talk 20:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Poaching in Popular culture

Should there be a section dubbed "Poaching in Popular Culture"? as it isn't all that hard to find in any fiction, particularly with fictional animal characters that have been victims of poaching or were at least affected by it. Examples include Alex the lion from the Madagascar franchise, Kerchak the gorilla of Disney's Tarzan film, Leo the lion from Blinky Bill’s Extraordinary Balloon Adventure, Grizz and Ice Bear the bears of We Bare Bears (though they aren't completely confirmed, and it isn't yet known at all if Panda was also a poacher-victim too or not), and who knows what else, but I do recommend it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.186.6.124 (talk) 04:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

This article is so long, and yet, still not all species covered that are threatened by poaching. Therefore, I suggest, not to extend this article with poaching in pop culture, but rather to create a new article, if at all. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Poaching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517061549/http://www.scientist.com/channel/life/endangered-species/dn3376 to http://www.scientist.com/channel/life/endangered-species/dn3376
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.newstribune.com/articles/2005/11/07/news_state/0110705035.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Poaching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111203443/http://www.biology.ufl.edu/courses/pcb5356/2011fall/kitajima/Redford1992Biosci.pdf to http://www.biology.ufl.edu/courses/pcb5356/2011fall/kitajima/Redford1992Biosci.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Poaching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128093002/http://www.theinternational.org/articles/188-continued-poaching-will-result-in-the-deg to http://www.theinternational.org/articles/188-continued-poaching-will-result-in-the-deg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402124230/http://www.iapf.org/images/documents/riseofthedronesjan2013.pdf to http://www.iapf.org/images/documents/riseofthedronesjan2013.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602101402/http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/poachers-are-still-getting-duped-into-shooting-robot-deer to http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/poachers-are-still-getting-duped-into-shooting-robot-deer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Introduction should mention environmental aspect

Someone reading just the introduction would come away thinking "So this is just some sort of medieval crime against the nobility's land rights, what's all the fuss?", when in fact the vast majority of news articles etc. about poaching today are concerned with environmental protection, not whether anyone's land rights have been violated. This aspect is mentioned in the article itself, but should be stressed in the introduction as well. --2.205.48.9 (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Sale of ivory after preventive tusk removal

Preventive tusk removal by park rangers has not been mentioned in this page. This seems a useful technique to discourage poachers and maintain the species and still be able to still sell the natural material.

The question is: what is the best approach then ? Sell those removed tusks instead of destroying them ? Or destroy them (which results in increased prices of ivory on the black market) (see destruction of ivory) ? I seem to think the best approach is to have the wildlife parks sell it, under a CITES certification, to bring in revenue for the wildlife park and help pay park ranger wages (resulting in better protection of the wildlife park).

Perhaps this can be mentioned somehow in the article ? --Genetics4good (talk) 12:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)