Talk:Plymouth Brethren

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Ef80 in topic Notable People

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Plymouth Brethren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Plymouth Brethren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Man's Sphere, Woman's Sphere edit

Very impressive historical entry for this obscure movement! Well done! I would add, however, that a critically important subject is all but missing here: how the women in this movement are to think, feel, act, look, behave, be. This is a distinctive of the Plymouth Brethren that is central to its doctrine and practice. In Gathering Unto His Name (chapters 7 & 14), for example, Norman Crawford speaks definitively of a man's sphere (the public sphere) and a woman's sphere (the home), as does Sydney Maxwell in The Person of Christ (chapter 26). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinyblip (talkcontribs) 15:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Plain English edit

I changed "planting churches" to "establishing churches" because the article is written in English. This was reverted because th PB had written their own language - which of course they are entitled to do. However, the Wikipedia reader needs the English language to be consistent. For example, John planted turnips, and, John established an organisation. We should be careful not to write articles as publicity for the subject's organisation. Francis Hannaway (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is not "publicity" for anything. The article already utilizes and explains terminology used within PB circles, such as "Brethren assemblies (as their gatherings are most often called)", "open Brethren", "exclusive Brethren", and "Lord's Supper". The PB circles have not "written their own language" and this is hardly "inconsistent" use of the English language. —Dilidor (talk) 11:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notable People edit

It's true that Aleister Crowley was raised in the Plymouth Brethren, but as an apostate, does he really belong here? And identifying him as the MAIN inspiration for the Beatles? I wouldn't argue the fact that he was an inspiration for the Beatles, but the main one? Man, somebody is grinding an axe here! GnatFriend (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Like it or not, AC is the singlemost notable person to come out of the Brethren. I've added him back in, though without the Beatles reference. 2600:8806:3400:E300:218F:2F4C:E661:CA15 (talk) 05:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ken Follett is also listed. Although raised in the Brethren, as an adult he's an atheist. Indeed, it's difficult to play any major public role in the modern world as an observant member of the Brethren, as the rules are so restrictive. --Ef80 (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Covid contracts edit

Concerned that the information contained in subheading regarding covid contracts is irrelevant, what does it matter that this group has people who independently own companies that are awarded contracts? Feels unusual for listing under a Wikipedia article regarding a religious sect.

Secondly the information contained does not reflect the citations, with one saying only £1.1bn worth of contracts awarded while the article claims £2.2bn. Can someone straighten out this confusion? Being off by £1.1bn seems... A lot... 2A00:23C4:2281:7B01:F54F:B840:F845:B29B (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply