Talk:Photosynthetic pigment

(Rated Stub-class)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (marked as High-importance).

UntitledEdit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

"However, none of the pigments absorbs well in the green-yellow region, which is responsible for the abundant green we see in nature." Quick qoogling for spectra (for example, carotene) shows that it isn't true. So I set citation needed tag. IMHO it is wrong connection between green color and absense of green-absorbing pinments, because we well know the reason why the leaves are turned to yellow in automn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.30.109 (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are other photosynthetic dexter such as Bacteriorhodopsin and vertebrate rhodopsin. Bacteriorhodopsin is used by the halobacteria in the Archaea and vertebrate rhopdopsin is to be found in the retina in the eyes of vertebrates. I'm sure there must be others... -Martin.

I don't think rhodopsin qualifies as a photosynthetic pigment. I added phycobilin, bacteriorhodopsin and bacteriochlorophyll. Do we have them all now? AxelBoldt 06:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What! Photosynthetic pigments are not photosynthetic pigment! I am outraged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksteuber (talk • contribs) 00:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disputed: I don't think Bacteriorhodopsin is considered a photosyntheic pigment. Also, Halobacteria (if you are speaking about the family Halobacteriales) do not undergo photosynthesis to the best of my knowledge.this page has no answers!!!!!!! They just use light to drive certain metabolic processes. Therefore, they cannot be considered photosynthetic archaea. I have added a disputed accuracy banner to the last section. Cypher3c (talk) 00:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Promotional contentEdit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I deleted the video as it was an commercial advertisement video and not a video about photosynthetic pigments.Felipe Jo (talk) 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic