Talk:Paleothermometer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Is Paleothermometer a good title? Merge into Proxy (climate)? edit

I don't recall seeing this term used in the paleoclimate literature, and note it is not in the titles of any reference cited here (tho there is one paper with "paleothermometry"). So I'm wondering if this is a good title, and why this isn't a part of the paleoclimatology article? It seems misleading to call a paleoclimate proxy a "Paleothermometer." Comments? TIA, Peter D. Tillman (late, forgotten SIG)

I don't think the title is a problem. But the enormous overlap with proxy (climate) is William M. Connolley (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
So -- should we tag it for a merge? Not a lot would survive, at first glance. Best, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Prooobably. The only wrinkle is that proxy, of itself, isn't just temperature - it also includes wind and precip. But, most attention focusses on temperature William M. Connolley (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paleothermometer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply