Pahang is currently a Places good article nominee.
Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article, as outlined on the nominations page.
Reviewers: To start the review process, follow this link: good article instructions.)Nominated by This will create a dedicated subpage for the GA review. Save this page. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try this talk page. See here for the Ø:G (talk) at 03:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pahang article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Pahang has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Geography, Countries. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, realise, defence, artefact), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pahang's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "census 2010":
- From Kuantan: Kewarganegaraan, Suku Bangsa, Agama dan Bahasa Sehari-hari Penduduk Indonesia Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2011. ISBN 9789790644175.
- From Johor: (PDF) http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/download_Population/files/population/04Jadual_PBT_negeri/PBT_Perak.pdf. Missing or empty
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)