Open main menu
WikiProject Typography (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

And now I see this pagination word was alive and well in 1550 era.

Retrieved from ""

To the author of this comment, you have missed the point. This article is referring to the actual use of pagination...not the origin/genesis of the word.

Biased referencesEdit

All but one reference is some obscure reference to a PHP blog of some kind, of which I suspect the contributors of this article has a connection to. --Bep (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Aren't these correlated?Edit

Layout (computing)

--Erquint (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Merge of Page numberingEdit

  • Oppose No reasoning given by nominator. Nor does it seem like a good idea. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose Pagination and page numbering are two different things. It does not make sense to merge them into one article. Proposer did not give any reasoning as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Return to "Pagination" page.