Talk:Orion (spacecraft)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Orion (spacecraft) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
Archives: Index, 1, 2 | |||
A news item involving Orion (spacecraft) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 December 2014. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted so long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, labor, traveled), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Orphaned references in Orion (spacecraft)Edit
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Orion (spacecraft)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "nsf-20180911":
- From Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway: Sloss, Philip (September 11, 2017). "NASA updates Lunar Gateway plans". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 2017-09-15.
- From Space Launch System: Sloss, Philip (11 September 2018). "NASA updates Lunar Gateway plans". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Updating the spoken version of the articleEdit
The spoken version of this article is now 5 years old, and there have been many major changes in that timeframe, and therefore I believe it to be appropriate to create a new version based on the current version of the article. I would personally be willing to record myself speaking this article.
Singularities421 (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletionEdit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Merger proposalEdit
The Orion article was tagged by user:Beland on 2 Nov 2019 for a Merge, but they stated no rationale for the merger. He/she proposed Crew Exploration Vehicle merging into Orion (spacecraft). Rowan Forest (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Don't merge - The Orion article is very long as it is and it will grow even larger as it begins to perform its several missions. I think that a brief mention in the History section is enough. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
@Rowan Forest: Hey, thanks for getting the conversation rolling. The main reason I proposed the merge is that it's unclear to me what the difference between the CEV and the Orion actually is. Aren't they the same thing by different names? -- Beland (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello. The Crew Exploration Vehicle was the generic name for a needed spacecraft. Several concepts were submitted, two were selected as finalists. It is definitely related, but as a history of Orion. Rowan Forest (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for the clarification. I've updated the article and dropped the merge tag. -- Beland (talk) 17:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)