A fact from Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —Vami♜_IV♠ 20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I am reviewing this article as the Coordinator of WikiProject Germany. Full disclosure: I would consider myself as being on good terms with the nominator, Gerda Arendt. —Vami♜_IV♠ 20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Per the Manual of Style section on italic type for names and titles. Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland, Veni redemptor gentium, Intende qui reges Israel, Veni Creator Spiritus, Nun freut euch, lieben Christen g'mein, and Orgelbüchlein should have their quotation marks (where applicable) removed and be italicized, as is the case for hymns in the second paragraph of section "History".
Thank you for the undertaking, and the copyedits. As far as I know, poems, songs and hymns are in quotation marks, no italics, while books, collections and hymnals are in italics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think we speak of different things. "Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland" is not a title. A title would be something like "Advent Hymn". "Nun komm ..." is an incipit, and so is "Veni redemptor gentium". In incipits, no title case, no italics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
What about as foreign-language text (in Latin script)? –♠Vami_IV†♠ 02:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The idea of quotation marks and italics is to separate from other text. Quotation marks clearly do that, - no need for Italics on top. Familiar Latin phrases, such as Nunc dimittis, dont even need quotation mark, and are straight. I think that Veni redemptor gentium comes close, but give it quotation marks because it's longer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. The other items I indicated that should be italicized are now, so I'm going to scratch this section off now. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 08:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
theology of the church If this is referring to the Roman Catholic Church, then "church" should be capitalized.
Well, good question. Very early into Reformation. Suggest to say "traditional" theology, - it's still more a catholic church than a Catholic Church. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, can't see what you mean with the [13]? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The problem is the "He", which I am to believe refers to Luther. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 08:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I don't know what you mean. Luther is (now) the subject of the first sentene, - the second would then refer to him, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind. I fixed it myself. The "He" was preceeded with a comma, not a period and last I checked, Luther is not a deity. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 05:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The third paragraph of this section has no citations.
Another good catch. I took the Red Shoes item from this blog, and thought I'd find a better source but didn't. We can drop it, or search harder. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Done, 
Fixed, 
Added, 
Not done, 
Doing..., or 
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —Vami♜_IV♠ 20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
