Talk:Norris–La Guardia Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adair edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Supreme Court declared similar legislation unconstitutional in Adair v. United States. The article would benefit from an explanation of how this act survived judicial scrutiny.Bill (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 July 2021 edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 03:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Norris–La Guardia Act of 1932 → Norris–La Guardia Act – This is the WP:COMMONNAME (see, e.g., the GScholar results, almost all of which omit the year), and there are no other Norris–La Guardia Acts with which this one might be confused. This appears to be our ordinary practice for unambiguous titles: see, e.g., Volstead Act, Lloyd–La Follette Act, and Adamson Act. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom; specifically per the lack of need for disambiguation and the comparison to other article titles. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic