Talk:Nasdaq Commodities

Discussion

For some reason the part concerning the the effect the current system of trading power has on prices for the consumers was removed completely. "Factual mistakes" was the reason stated. Can we get a discussion going about what was actually wrong. I put the part back, and just would like input on what exactly was wrong and what can be changed to make it more acceptable for everyone. I think the role of Nord Pool in deciding the price for the end-users of the electricity traded deserves a place in the article.

The section that you reinstated looks very much like an ill-informed POV piece from some discussion board. Bold negative statements like "Vattenfall, Statkraft and Fortum, are by law required to sell the power produced to Nord Pool" and "The outgoing price that Nord Pool sets is determined by the "last and most expensive kWh"" need to to cite sources, which will be hard to do since they are in fact, not true. --Frohrstrand (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright issues

Large part of the text seems to be copied from the Nord Pool website. Needs to be rewritten.Beagel (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Ownership

The ownership structure has changed, needs to be updated.Beagel (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it was Lars Galtung who made the changes and added the copied texts. I think he himself is a company representative, so would that make it a copyright issue? If I read the "edit page history" correctly, I think he added the copied paragraphs. /Jaakka 2008-03-04

In this case, it depends if there is permission to use this info in Wikipedia or not. Even so, the text needs copyediting because it reads more like advertisement than encyclopedic text. Also the ownership structure needs to be updated.Beagel (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The ownership change was just a correction of an error. Fortum was listed as one of the owners and they have never owned any part of Nord Pool. Fingrid, which was not listed is however an owner so i assumed this was a case of mistaken identity and corrected it. --Frohrstrand (talk) 13:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually I mean that Nord Pool Clearing and some other subsidiaries were taken over by OMX and Nord Pool Spot is separated from Nord Pool.Beagel (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, yes i just realized what you meant. I think it should be considered to have separate articles for Nord Pool Spot and Nord Pool ASA. The ownership listed in this article appears to be Nord Pool Spots. --Frohrstrand (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

As Nord Pool ASA will be owned by NASDAQ OMX, information about Nord pool Spot AS was split into Nord Pool Spot article. Beagel (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. Dpmuk (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

---

Nord Pool → NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe — After acquisition by NASDAQ OMX, Nord Pool changed its name and adapted trading name NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. After this change, name Nord Pool is not used anymore by this company and it refers only to Nord Pool Spot, which is separate legal entity owned by different owners. Beagel (talk) 11:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support, clear-cut corporate name-change. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:08, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nord Pool AS which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)