Talk:Nikkei 225

Why 225?

Why 225 and not 200 or 250? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.161.128 (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

The no. of components in any stock market index is a judgement call by the organization sponsoring the index. Goals include creating a representative average of the market, and a decision must be made to cut off the list at some general level of market capitalization (size of company). Not too big, not too small, "just right", Goldilocks. Wbm1058 (talk) 17:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Keeping the index up to date

Monitor Nikkei press releases announcing component changes at the news room.

In addition to updating Nikkei 225, please also update Template:Nikkei 225, and keep them synchronized. Add the template to new index components' articles, and remove it from removed components' articles.

It should not be necessary to directly update category:Nikkei 225. Changes to the template will automatically propagate to the category, as long as the template is included in all components' articles, though there may be several minutes delay before this happens. The only index components that have been manually updated to the category are a few redirects, such as Sumitomo Metal Mining, which redirects to its conglomerate parent Sumitomo Group because Wikipedia has no article on that Nikkei 225 index component company. – Wbm1058 (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Not an index

It is a price-weighted index (the unit is yen),

An index has no units. The unit is yen because it is an average, and not an index. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.144.152 (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nikkei 225. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111212205534/http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/Nikkei to http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/Nikkei
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222020349/http://www.nni.nikkei.co.jp/FR/SERV/nikkei_indexes/nifaq225.html to http://www.nni.nikkei.co.jp/FR/SERV/nikkei_indexes/nifaq225.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

When did Nikkei first come to the Stock Market?

When did Nikkei 225 first come to the Stock Market?

Haskell Brown Jr (talk) 04:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Chart at top of page.

What kind of scale is that? That chart is super misleading. At one point the Nikkei lost half its value but it makes it look like a minor dip. The scale should be uniform or you’re giving people the wrong idea as many may not look carefully at the y axis. Fjf1085 (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Also, it stops at 2014. The Nikkei has done much better since then. The old graphics leaves out the economic performance under Abe and gives the impression Japan is stagnant where it has improved dramatically under a more aggressive fiscal stance which some economists wish weren't true (Austrians/gold standard enthusiasts/austerity advocates/inflation hawks). Agendas are all well and good, but when facts start to demolish the argument, hiding the facts isn't the key to winning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamjacobs (talk • contribs) 09:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Opinionated analysis of the market's movement

This part:

> On February 15, 2021, the Nikkei average breached the 30,000 benchmark, its highest level in 30 years, due to the levels of monetary stimulus and asset purchase programs executed by the Bank of Japan to mitigate the financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.[11]

Is very opinionated and not factual. Monetary stimulus does not directly translate to higher stock prices. Higher confidence in the market and long-term commitment by central banks to act in its favor does.

My source is Evaluating Asset-Market Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Cross-Country Comparison, a 2014 Federal Reserve discussion paper.

~~Tolki~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaryTolki (talk • contribs) 06:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Creation of new category

Creation If we look at Category:Companies by stock market index, most of the world's major indices are listed, except for the Nikkei. Can somebody add this? 92.71.60.62 (talk) 09:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Black Monday 2024

Las acciones asiáticas cayeron un 8% el lunes 5 de agosto, reflejando las pérdidas en Wall Street del viernes 2 de agosto, impulsadas por preocupaciones sobre una posible recesión en EE.UU. y ganancias decepcionantes de las principales empresas tecnológicas. 2806:2F0:51C1:F311:8458:7986:95D1:C2BA (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Where's the Nikkei 500?

This is not my area of expertise, but there exists a Nikkei 500 as well as a Nikkei 225. The former does not have its own Wikipedia article, and is unmentioned in this one. (Gosh, it looks like there is also a Nikkei 300). Presumably, despite my awareness (as a random lay person!) of the 500 but not the 225, — presumably the 225 is much more popular or significant? And yet…well, I am confused. Could someone clarify? Thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 06:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)