Talk:New Circle Road

Title

Shouldn't the article be named Kentucky Route 4?

-ComputerGuy890100 (talk) 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move Mike Cline (talk) 12:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

---

New Circle Road → Kentucky Route 4 – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Road articles should be named for their route number if they have one. Dough4872 18:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• "Road articles should be named for their route number if they have one." Why? —  AjaxSmack  01:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Route numbers are the most official way of referring to a road and is a standard naming convention. For example, we have Maryland Route 200 instead of Intercounty Connector and Interstate 695 (Maryland) instead of Baltimore Beltway. Dough4872 04:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Check out WP:UCN (use common names). Maryland Route 200 should be moved as well since that name is barely used, even in official documents. —  AjaxSmack  23:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
      • The discussion that occured at MD 200 resulted in no consensus to move from the Maryland Route 200 title. Dough4872 01:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose the move per WP:UCN (use common names) and the spirit of WP:OFFICIALNAMES. —  AjaxSmack  23:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on New Circle Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040403075734/http://www.newcircleroad.com:80/ to http://www.newcircleroad.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070430064216/http://www.planning.kytc.ky.gov:80/data_reports.asp to http://www.planning.kytc.ky.gov/data_reports.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Interstate 464

The article says that the highway was supposed to be designated as Interstate 464 (but was cancelled, due to no connection to I-64). However, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet doesn't seem to have any information on it. I know that Kurumi's 3di page and the Interstate Guide are not reliable sources, but I looked at both of them, and neither of them have any information either. What should be done? Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

See WP:PROVEIT. If there is nothing to back it up, then it should be removed. –Fredddie™ 17:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

It should be removed. With that said, get ready for every new editor that reads those sources re-adding it to the page. I finally gave up on a similar issue with Arizona State Route 51, there are reiable sources that it was intended to be a spur from I-10, but Kurami's site goes a step further and says it was supposed to be I-510, and well I finally gave up reverting it. Dave (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Circle Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040403075734/http://www.newcircleroad.com/ to http://www.newcircleroad.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)