Talk:Indigenous cuisine of the Americas

(Redirected from Talk:Native American cuisine)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Valereee in topic Content/context removal?

Tumbleweed needs disambiguation edit

I tagged the link in this article to tumbleweed with {{dn}} because "tumbleweed" can refer to any one of several plants, most of those plants are not edible, and some are not native to North America. See Tumbleweed (disambiguation). --Una Smith (talk) 14:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article needs more references and cleanup edit

Added tag {{Multiple issues|refimprove=May 2010|cleanup=May 2010}} 96.41.164.58 (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested merge 17 September 2017 edit

Country foodNative American cuisineKintetsubuffalo suggested the merger of Native American cuisine and Country food (See this edit).

Support since the content in Country food will easily fit under the subscetion "Native American cuisine of North America" of this article. --Maumivi (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I suggested that Country food be merged into this article, so it should be Country foodNative American cuisine.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
My bad! I edited the order and thanks for letting me know. It would be great if you make a discussion page in the talk page of the article when you suggest a merger next time. --Maumivi (talk) 05:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Done

Vomit-inducing drink? edit

I remember once as a kid I went to a museum in Florida where they described the various ritual teas people drank that forced them to vomit and perhaps induced visions (memory isn't clear on that part). This describes the black drink well, and is likely the same thign. I never really saw a drink that you couldn't keep down as food. It was meant to be consumed, but not for the sake of being food. If it doesn't stay in the stomach because of its toxicity, and the intention is to expel it from the body by the mouth, can it really be called food? I'm not so sure it should be in here. It's a drug taken religiously/spiritually, not food.Wacape (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Content/context removal? edit

Hey, Bohemian Baltimore, I see a series of edits here and at Louis Trevino and Vincent Medina, it looks like you're arguing these guys aren't native American and they shouldn't be calling their food indigenous because the tribe isn't federally recognized? Valereee (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@User:Valereee Hi, thanks for asking for clarification. There are hundreds of groups, often non-profit organizations, that claim to be Native American tribes or that call themselves Native American heritage groups. There is no Ohlone tribe recognized by the federal government or even by the California government. There are no state-recognized tribes in California. These are individuals who belong to non-profits or other groups. They can't be called "Native American" or "Ohlone" without clarification. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 12:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bohemian Baltimore, is that how the RS are referring to them -- 'self-identifies as Ohlone' or whatever? (Sorry for being lazy, just figured you probably actually know the answer.) Valereee (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Got less lazy. :D NYT is just calling them Ohlone? Valereee (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Among those leading the way are Medina, of the ‌Chochenyo Ohlones from the East Bay, and the cafe’s co-founder, Louis ‌Trevino, 31, of the Rumsen Ohlones, ‌a group from Monterey County. Valereee (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also says In 1925, the influential anthropologist Alfred Louis Kroeber, who led the museum for 38 years, declared the Ohlone people “extinct,” which two years later resulted in a loss of federal tribal recognition and rights to the land base. So they were at one time recognized...I'm a little uncomfortable with this. Valereee (talk) 12:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have reverted User:Bohemian Baltimore's edits to Vincent Medina and thoroughly explained my reasoning here. I now see that they have been making similar edits here and elsewhere. I believe many of them should be reverted as well, for similar reasons. Blackberryrose (talk) 07:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I think if RS are calling them Ohlone/Native American, and they're calling themselves that, for us to say they "self-identify" as that because the tribes aren't federally recognized is getting pretty close to original research. Valereee (talk) 11:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply