This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The life reconstruction in questionWe could replace this one
Since Othnielosaurus is now a synonym of this genus, shouldn't we use the life reconstruction of it for Nanosaurus? OviraptorFan (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Not really much room, but it could replace one of the skeletons. FunkMonk (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps this one picture could be replaced, since it's not exactly needed. OviraptorFan (talk) 14:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think first we should expand the article, because with a better description section and one for classification we can probably fit all the images we want in. IJReid{{T - C - D - R}} 16:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ah, Alright. I guess we can do that.OviraptorFan (talk) 19:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Also, if all these taxa are the same, we can use one of the better skeletal mount photos in the taxobox and put the old holotype scraps in the history section. FunkMonk (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
