The sentences on Versailles were a little POV, as were two assessing his works from a very subjective position (I quote from memory: "not as good a writer as Tolstoy or Lampedusa", "his world was gone"). On Versailles (and Trianon?), I attempted to use a tone that would be acceptable for both sides: if for some reason I have failed, please reformulate to something of that ilk that better suits the NPOV goal, and do not simply revert to the previous version (note that I have used the same approach when mentioning N.Transylvania further in the text). Dahn 10:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Two years later, in revenge for Bánffy's actions in Bucharest, Bonczhida was burned and looted by the retreating German army - what's the source for this? --Roamataa 14:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Would it not make as much or more sense to add this page to WikiProject Hungary? It is, after all something fairly new that Transylvania is Romanian.
--Mjjzf (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
- There is absolutely nothing preventing anyone from adding it in both (both, because he actually had a sensible impact on the history of Romania - obviously not nearly as much as he meant for Hungary/Hungarians/Hungarian life). My guess is that the reason why he's not already in both is that the projects work independently, and one's existence preceded the other. Dahn (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
