Talk:Michael Stone (loyalist)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Shenme in topic 3 + 2 = 9 ?

Birthplace edit

born ... Birmingham, England, moved to Belfast at 5 months old

I reverted the above information which was added by an anon IP. It may be correct, but I couldn't find any evidence for it, so it needs a citation. Richard W.M. Jones 22:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I reverted the same just now. Please, anon IPs, add a verifiable reference if it's true. Richard W.M. Jones 22:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Funny how this guy is "British" edit

But others from Northern ireland are refered to as Irish... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.35.102 (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stormin' Stormont edit

Can I just say two things: 1. WTF?!? 2. Yeooooooooooooooo!--feline1 12:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

'He will go back in prison' edit

Isn't that the case of no brown stuff Sherlock. RMC1989 20:29, 24 November 2006

when you consider that some retard let him OUT in the first place, I wouldn't be surprised if they still let him out, in case they "damage the peace process".

There's nothing like a measured, well considered and balanced comment to capture the moment. Well done you.[[User:The Boy that time London Authority" to "Greater London Council", as the GLA didn't exist at the time.

The link may need to be changed accordingly.

Stormont Attack = Art edit

There's nothing in the article about Stone claiming his attack on Stormont was art, and the acting out of a "real" terror attack. Should it be added?

definitely, hes an artist not a killer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.99.11 (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spide? edit

I'm surprised that we can't mention in the article that Stone is a good example of what is colloquially known as a spide. If wikipedia can have an article on the term spide, surely that term becomes usable in other articles? I appreciate that (i) it's a subjective judgement and (ii) a pejorative term - but does this mean the article cannot note that many of Stone's countrymen would apply the term to him? --feline1 15:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Wikipedia has articles on lots of pejorative POV terms, that doesn't give us a license to go around applying them to people. Even if you found a reliable source that called Stone a "spide" (which you haven't), it's still an inherently POV term with no clear definition. Demiurge 16:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
What sort of "source" would you need. I, for example, am born in raised in NornIrond, and thus have been using that slang term all my life. I would call Michael Stone a spide. How else can slang from dialects be "sourced" other than by people who use that dialect?--feline1 16:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
The kind of source that I'd need would be a reliable source. Plenty of slang words can be properly sourced — look at Scanger for examples. If you can't source it, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Demiurge 16:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
You mean if *one* cannot source it, it doesn't belong in wikipedia. My personal abilities to source things are irrelevant. --feline1 23:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Huh? Is this a joke?! Stu ’Bout ye! 09:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, it is performance art :) --feline1 11:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ha! If you had called Johnny Adair a spide on his page, I might have agreed! Stu ’Bout ye! 11:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well he's a spide too. But I imagine some busybody would require me to reference Stephen Nolan saying so in BBC Radio Ulster before wikipedia could acknowledge the fact :0/--feline1 12:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Membership of the UDA edit

The article states that Stone was arrested at the age of 16 for firearms possession and membership in the UDA, but the UDA was not outlawed until 1992. When Stone was 16 years old in 1971, the UDA was still legal.jeanne (talk) 13:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Artist edit

hehe. Well, I'm not going to remove that! I don't know how yer man on UTV kept a straight face reporting that last night. It deserves a complete quote here; about Stone trying to kill Adams and McGuinness as his artistic means to say goodbye to the paramilitary Michael Stone and signal the arrival of the artist, Michael Stone. Inspired- maybe he is actually an artist (or else his insanity-conscious lawyer is- ahem). 193.203.136.185 (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


What about the fact that Transporter 2 was dedicated to him? It's in the end of the movie just of the start of the "scroll text": this film is dedicated to the memory of Michael Stone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.94.248.244 (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

loyalist paramilitary ... or simply ... terrorist ? edit

TBH, the (loyalist paramilitary) disambiguator seems a bit POV-ish to me as a non-expert. So what's the difference? 78.34.145.215 (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Retaliation edit

The article says that the Milltown attack was in retaliation for the IRA's Enniskillen Remembrance Day bombing in November 1987. However, UDA South Belfast brigadier John McMichael was blown up in December 1987 by an IRA booby-trap car bomb planted by an ASU led by Sean Savage. Couldn't the attack also have been carried out in retaliation for McMichael's killing?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Early years edit

Where did the section on his early life disappear to? I presume he did have a life prior to the Milltown Massacre or was he just magically conjured from out of nowhere the day of the shootings?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Stone (loyalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

3 + 2 = 9 ? edit

Funny how often an article's text, if read all in one go, appears hopelessly contradictory. So one place says he has had 9 children from 2 marriages. Another place says 3 children from 1st marriage, then 2 more from 2nd marriage. Shenme (talk) 01:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply