Talk:MediaSentry

Decoying and spoofing

Help. I somehow screwed up this page. I wanted to add a citation to the secrecy statement, and to add a new point, with citations, regarding MediaSentry's sending out corrupted files to discourage copying. Much of the article has disappeared, however.

Legality

This doesn't sound too legal. - Thekittenofterra 23:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, stealing music is still illegal. Some crackpots believe otherwise. ;) Dynablaster (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

"Internal Emails of An RIAA Attack Dog Leaked"

Is this notable? http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/09/15/1843234.shtml - (Unregistered) 07:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but it belongs in the MediaDEFENDER article. Not the MediaSENTRY Article. Two different companies ;) -- 217.136.193.82 18:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Re-adding content

This page was moved to a redirect to SafeNet a few months ago. Now that SafeNet has sold the company, I've returned the content here to its own page. I've updated the content based on the edits made to the SafeNet article, so it should be current, but may need layout editing. Rurik (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

NYT not reliable?

Since when is the New York Times considered an unreliable source? Rees11 (talk) 21:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

The New York Times was removed in error. Dynablaster (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MediaSentry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016221232/http://www.safenet-inc.com/products/sentinel/mediasentry_intellectual_property_protection.asp to http://www.safenet-inc.com/products/sentinel/mediasentry_intellectual_property_protection.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901210456/http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS241090+02-Apr-2009+GNW20090402 to https://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS241090+02-Apr-2009+GNW20090402

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)