Talk:Mecca crane collapse
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mecca crane collapse article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A news item involving Mecca crane collapse was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 September 2015. |  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of the damage caused by the collapse be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Saudi Arabia may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
WikiNews edit
Why is there nothing about this on WikiNews? --2001:4898:80E8:7:0:0:0:370 (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Any wiki material is created at the prerogative of its own author, and anyone can edit, including you. Typically, WikiNews has less traffic and users than Wikipedia, so I assume this is omission rather than an editorial decision that it was not newsworthy '''tAD''' (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- An article about this subject was created on WikiNews at 04:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC). Mz7 (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
bin Laden connection edit
Is mentioning the crane operator's connection to Osama bin Laden relevant to this article? Twirly Pen (Speak up) 00:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- It was exploited as a headline-grabber by some tabloids (including the Daily Mail source referenced throughout this article), but the Binladen group is a huge corporation in Saudi Arabia despite the obvious tarnishing of the name. If it's mentioned appropriately according to reliable sources, there shouldn't be a problem '''tAD''' (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but I'm sure that information is already in Mohammed bin Laden's wiki article. I just don't see the notability of the connection here. Would we mention relatives of the owner had it been another crane operator? Twirly Pen (Speak up) 02:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, it doesn't make sense. 64.134.62.246 (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but I'm sure that information is already in Mohammed bin Laden's wiki article. I just don't see the notability of the connection here. Would we mention relatives of the owner had it been another crane operator? Twirly Pen (Speak up) 02:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Photo of crane edit
The article could be improved by including a photo of the type of crane involved in the accident, even if it is the crane that collapsed. For now, I've added an external link to the Liebherr English-language page for the the LR 11350 crawler cranes, but since it is an external source, link-rot could make the pictures go away unexpectedly. — QuicksilverT @ 15:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mecca crane collapse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150914232449/http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_8-turkish-pilgrims-die-in-crane-collapse-at-grand-mosque_398969.html to http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_8-turkish-pilgrims-die-in-crane-collapse-at-grand-mosque_398969.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150925130714/http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150921257305 to http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150921257305
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926211453/http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150917256911 to http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150917256911
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)