Talk:Marie de' Medici cycle

Untitled

There seem to be lots of new editors who have been editing just this one article. Has it been adopted as a school or university project of some sort? (I am not criticising - there is a lot of good work here: just wondering if someone would like to claim the credit at Wikipedia:School and university projects.) -- !! ?? 10:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, in fact this is a university project. Thank you for providing the link. --Barococo 14:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Well done so far. It is clear that different parts of this article have been written by different hands: I take it the aim will be to produce a single, collaborative article, rather than a collection of thumbnail sketches? -- !! ?? 16:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. With a number of people working on it, right now it is mostly about getting information added. Certainly at the moment some editing is required, such as reducing a few areas that don't need to be so elaborate and expanding a few lacunae. In time, as is hoped from a collaborative effort, the individual voices will be softened and some of the technical aspects will be smoothed over. The project extends until November 9, so there will probably be frequent changes up until that time. --Barococo 17:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Reputation

What's the critical attitude toward all these paintings?  To me they look like one huge commercial for a Renaissance politician, and it's dismaying that Rubens spend so much talent on it.73.137.170.88 (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marie de' Medici cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030914111817/http://www.students.sbc.edu/vandergriff04/mariedemedici.html to http://www.students.sbc.edu/vandergriff04/mariedemedici.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The Consignment of the Regency

To be slightly picky, the orb as a symbol of rule is at least as old as Holy Roman Emperor Otto I and probably goes back to Charlemagne and the Popes. Or is it referring to the first occurrence of the orb in the French monarchy depictions?--Chrystomath2 (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

What's the bibliographical reference for "McGrath"?

The notes refer to "McGrath" without elaboration. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 11:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)