Talk:Mackenzie Valley Pipeline
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Canada may be able to help! |
Discussion edit
It is worthwhile to note the probable greenhouse gas effects of this pipeline and the usage of the gas for oil sands extraction. According to the David Suzuki Foundation, it could contribute 25 megatonnes of greenhouse gases. That is 15 times the total GHG releases for Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. This has led the Suzuki Foundation to recommend the cancellation of the pipeline.
David Suzuki Foundation. All Over the Map: 2006 Status Report of Provincial Climate Change Plans. 2006.
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/climate/AOTM2_English.pdf
- Given that the majority of NG is used for home heating or electricity generation, and that it is the most efficient fossil fuel in either of those roles, by far, it is more accurate to say that using the NG would offset 50 megatons of GHG from coal and oil. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
And that is? edit
The lead mentions that the gas fields should contain " 1.9 trillion cubic metres " of NG. How does that compare with other fields worked by similar methods? I'm trying to understand whether this is a lot or a little gas. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mackenzie Valley Pipeline/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This article is in great shape: NPOV, good length, up to date, nice blockquotes, nice style.70.75.22.190 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 11:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 22:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mackenzie Valley Pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.mvapg.com/page/page/1922394.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928031300/http://www.imperialoil.ca/Canada-English/Files/ThisIs/InTouch_Spring07.pdf to http://www.imperialoil.ca/Canada-English/Files/ThisIs/InTouch_Spring07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)