Talk:MV Höegh Osaka

List

I'm watching the press conference on BBC TV News. Claim made that vessel developed a severe list and was then beached on the Bramble Bank. Mjroots (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

They mentioned that near the end of this article but that severe list could very well have been because they ran around... Ship companies always try to downplay their wrecks. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 19:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

The BBC has now confirmed that the vessel was beached due to a list developing after they started to get underway OSUBrit (talk) 20:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Beached or grounded?

Was the ship beached or grounded? My interpretation is that the former is generally intentional, the latter is generally unintentional. Mjroots (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Good point, the beaching page says: "or grounded deliberately in shallow water". I would use MV Cougar Ace but they manage to not use either word (might need fixing actually). I think grounding is more suitable because beaching usually refers to the intentional landing of a boat on the shore which didn't quite happen here. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 00:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Port of Southampton Vessel Traffic Services is calling it a grounding. --Northernhenge (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Page moving

I've protected the page from being moved by editors who don't have admin privileges. The article started at MV Hoegh Osaka and was moved to MV Höegh Osaka. It has now been moved back to the original title. I'm not saying that either move was wrong, and neither was made in bad faith. Let's concentrate on the important things, such as improving and already decent article, rather than worrying over diacritics. If anyone feels strongly that the article should be at the other title, then WP:RM is always available. Mjroots (talk) 12:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Alt pic

Higher res but weaker lighting:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hoegh_osaka_Bramble_Bank_daylight.JPG

©Geni (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

maib report

Its big. short version not enough ballast:

https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/listing-flooding-and-grounding-of-vehicle-carrier-hoegh-osaka

©Geni (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Long version, not enough ballast. Mjroots (talk) 06:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MV Hoegh Osaka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150104105010/http://www.hoeghautoliners.com/ikbViewer/page/hainternet/fleet_info/vessel?p_document_id=13603 to http://www.hoeghautoliners.com/ikbViewer/page/hainternet/fleet_info/vessel?p_document_id=13603

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 12 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

---

MV Hoegh Osaka → MV Höegh Osaka – We should use the diacritic, and a redirect from the plain-ASCII version. This is thoroughly sourced. Also our article at Leif Höegh & Co is using it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

• Support per company name. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.