 | This page was proposed for deletion by TheLongTone (talk · contribs) in the past. It was contested by Xoloz (talk · contribs) |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Merge/redirect edit
As the article now shows that we've already got an article on sociology of science (of which this sense of "logology" is a synonym), would it not make sense to merge this article into the latter? —Psychonaut (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Psychonaut: As it reads now this is a Wiktionary (dictionary) entry, not a Wikipedia (encyclopedia) one. I support merge or redirect (although expansion would be preferable). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Logology (sociology) edit
This page was moved without discussion from Logology (sociology) to Logology (science of science). There are actually two meanings of the term as it is used in sociology, the second one mentioned in the sentence the "Burke's logology has been cited as a useful tool of sociology." I think the original title was therefore more appropriate. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Since there already was a separate article on "Logology (theology)", and none on "Logology (science of science)", it seemed useful to retitle the article so as to highlight its principal subject. Stanisław Ossowski and Maria Ossowska, as referenced in the article, specifically viewed the sociology of science as one of the components to be subsumed within a broader field of logological inquiry into the nature of science.
- I would welcome an expansion of the article on "Logology (theology)" so as to provide a more detailed discussion of that specific subject.Nihil novi (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Logology (science of science). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130219224025/http://sci.slis.indiana.edu/ to http://sci.slis.indiana.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Doubts edit
Source for these statements? I think in general this page should be made more clear in every possible way. Ogoorcs (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- I don't understand the question. The source (a Scientific American article) is given.
- Nihil novi (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)