Talk:Limahl

Latest comment: 1 year ago by CureComet in topic Openly Gay

Untitled comment edit

Where's the objectivity? I personally find this article very rude towards Limahl and think a clean up is in order. Hilljayne (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I cant find anything rude in it, but try to remember that Wikipedia is not supposed to be a fan site. As long as it's true, it has to show the good with the bad.79.66.91.241 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


So is his name Liam or Chris? What? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.48.6.140 (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is a grammatical mess. Please have someone who grasps English syntax rewrite this immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.105.117 (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh God, can somebody please copy-edit this so it can be understood by those who read English...KhProd1 (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The pictures of Limahl in Poland (2006) and England (2007) are the same. Or are all his shows the same? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.178.176 (talk) 00:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jupiter? edit

I'm far from an expert on Limahl's career, but that's not stopped me from stumbling upon remixes created by the "Jupiter" team, of which Limahl was member. I am a little surprised that this article doesn't mention this at all, as it strikes me as something that should be relevant to the article. Calanor (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Limahl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Openly Gay edit

Where in the cited newspaper article does it use the phrase "openly gay" - he's gay - the word "openly" is outdated and demeanong to gay people. 31.50.225.76 (talk) 21:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

openly is wikipedia standard and used across most articles about gay people, see an article like Lil Nas X for an example CureComet (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply