Talk:Life Is Strange: Before the Storm/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Freikorp in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 23:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    "James reveals that the woman they saw him kissing was Rachel's biological mother" - now I'm confused; so does Rachel have a non-biological mother, presumably the woman whom James is cheating on? How does Rachel not know who her biological mother is?
    She was adopted, and this being a story twist, I don't know how to clarify other than specifying with "biological".
    Solved the problem. Cognissonance (talk) 14:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
    "the developer's proprietary StoryForge tools" - what does this mean? As in, what do StoryForge tools do?
    I added the abstract functions of StoryForge, as going too much into detail would be redundant IMO.
    "criticised plotholes" - can you give me an example of a plothole? I think the article could benefit from mentioning one
    Critics avoided spoilers, so quotes like "logic holes big enough to drive Chloe's truck through" only amount to general statements.
    "Most Touching Moment" - can you indicate what this moment was?
    Done.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?  
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?  
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?  
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?  
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?  
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Fantastic work on this article. Looking forward to passing it once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
    @Freikorp: Thank you very much. I've responded to your concerns above. Cognissonance (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
    I'm very happy with your changes. Passing this now. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply