Talk:Kufic

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Boutarfa Nafia in topic Discussion

}}

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mamasanogo81. Peer reviewers: Zoedescoteaux.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2018 and 19 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carolynassaf.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kufic encyclopedia edit

The Kufic style of calligraphy can be regarded as the unique masterpiece of human calligraphy, because this style has reached every corner of the world. The Kufic style of calligraphy could be found everywhere ranging from the margins of Greek (Byzantine) icons and the engravings in French and Italian Churches to the inscriptions on coins and the buildings of African people. On the one hand Kufic is the ancient writing style of the Middle Easterners and on the other hand, the people of India and China have contributed to its spread.

The very unique, extraordinary, and highly impressive visual capabilities of the Kufic style of calligraphy, as well as its mysterious and profound quality which creates a kind of dynamic energy, and its potentials to produce a variety of attractive forms based on the primary Kufic style, are only a few characteristics of this type of calligraphy. Due to its infinite mysteries, the primary Kufic style (highly emphasized here) as being cryptic, seems not to have been deciphered yet and may never be.

One of the open secrets is the special pen used in the writing of early Kufic. Researchers like Martin Lings and Annemarie Schimmel believe that Kufic calligraphers used to write with tools other than the pen (and possibly used tools like modern matrix).

Mr. Seyed Mohamad Vahid Mosavi Jazayeri after years of research, in the first volume of the "Kufic Encyclopedia", compiled and published under the title of "Learning How to Write the Primary Kufic Style of Calligraphy" in a new method has proved that early Kufic writing involved the use of a sharp and exclusive special pen. With the use of this special pen, the author has made possible the teaching of primary Kufic calligraphy.

...

Please do not hesitate to ask me if you have any question.

Regards, Director for Coordination and Sales of the Kufic Encyclopedia

I removed a section of purely commercial advertising from here (where you see "..."). I thought it not appropriate, however I left in the information that seemed relevant. Also see Mashford's note below. Philip Howard (talk) 02:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible moving text? edit

Perhaps all of the above would be more appropriate in the main article? Perhaps the Director did not get the idea of the wiki. --Mashford 00:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ancient Kufic vs Square Kufic edit

Perhaps the article should more clearly distinguish the ancient Kufic script style of early manuscripts; and the present day stylised square Kufic (or rectangular Kufic, geometric Kufic) used in present day designs and logos.
With the current text, it is not always clear when the article is discussing one and when it is discussing the other. Jheald (talk) 08:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. I can't get my head around the concept, that every single modern geometric font is being called "kufic". At least I have never seen any other classification mentioned. I'm not an expert on arabic, but I can decipher some words. I find the appearance of the more usual fluent calligraphy much closer to the ancient kufic handwriting than the latter to what's being called "square geometric kufic", where a beginner has problems to identify the individual letters. For me "kufic" only makes sense in connection with the old handwritings. See the topmost comment, where a self proclaimed expert on kufism talks about his magic reed pen.
(I fully realize that I'm responding to an eight year old comment. What does this say about the development of this article?)
--BjKa (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

writing error edit

The actual arabic writing used to represent "allah al akbar" in this article is backwards. It has the word allah to the left of al akbar as if we were reading from left to right. It should match the writing on the image of the Iraqi flag. I would change it myself but I am worried I will mess it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.167.255.156 (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

source of this article edit

It appears that this article is based almost entirely on a non-academic polemic article written for a clear religious purpose. It should be rewritten on the basis of scholarly sources. McKay (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes and of course if you read all the articles carefully in the site, the site is no more than a 'Christian vs Islam' debate site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.54.106.25 (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proof for: edit

  • Wolfgang Kosack: Islamische Schriftkunst des Kufischen. Geometrisches Kufi in 593 Schriftbeispielen. Deutsch – Kufi – Arabisch. Christoph Brunner, Basel 2014, ISBN 978-3-906206-10-3.

https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=simpleSearch&query=islamische+schriftkunst+des+kufischen --77.58.210.35 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vikings edit

I see a (badly edited in) reference to the claim that Vikings "had Allah written in their clothes".

This would be relevant to the article, if properly presented both in format and with the caveat that Larsson's claim is one that other experts do not accept as obviously true, involving deeply speculative "reconstruction" and accusations of mere pareidolia.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kufic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kufic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Addition on Variations of Kufic edit

Hello,

I believe that adding further explanation/instances of the variations of Kufic script may be helpful, as there is only a description of the uses and examples of square Kufic script at the moment. Perhaps adding sections on floriated and knotted Kufic would balance the article a little better, as those variations are mentioned in the lead but not elsewhere.

Best, Figapartmenttoast (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An example of square kufic letter edit

 
the letter alif drawn on a grid.
ShlomoKatzav (talk) 04:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

The Kufic script did not originate in koufa even if it did get its name from, it did exist from early Islam in Arabia. Boutarfa Nafia (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply