Talk:Kuşadası

District

I suppose, until the two articles are split, that the district and town can share the same article. BUT, the section names (except the lead paragraph) should be different to enable a split later. Student7 (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I will plead in favor of the first paragraph as I edited on 1 Sept. It could be a question of style. A comprehensive beginning section with detailed explanations below is, as I see it, not an unbecoming pattern for articles for many cities; see Manisa, Bornova or Kemalpaşa where I can lay claims to have edited extensively. The approach is probably more fitting for Kuşadası where a substantial part of the town's essence owes to its location as “utilitarian base for excursions to the major antiquities inland” (Rough Guide to Turkey; Rosie Ayliffe, Marc Dubin, John Gawthrop, Terry Richardson, 2003, ISBN 1843530716). If you are starting to explain Kuşadası; places like Ephesus, Priene and House of the Virgin Mary have to be in the lead. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 12:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

"Liberated"

This is one of the type of WP:W2W along with "terrorist", "guerrilla", and a whole bunch of other phrases that winners or losers use to describe their wonderful position or the bad position of the other guy. Really need to avoid this sort of thing in all articles which is why they have policies on it. Student7 (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:W2W does not discourage against the use of "Liberated". Kavas (talk) 22:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Occupation

Is there an objection for the word "occupation"?Kavas (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Seems to read okay now, if you are happy with it. The word "occupied" might be okay if all parties, including the Turks "occupy." The word "occupation" makes it sound as though the encyclopedia has taken a stand on who should have been there. (The "occupiers" should not have been there in the first place). Rather than do that, it is neutral so use some other word "taken," "won control" or whatever. There is only one real fact for that paragraph and that is that the Turks won final control. That seems to be clearly stated under everyone's construction so far. Student7 (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

You cannot use "occupied" for both parties, because it can be only used for occupying forces. Can you please read http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne before asking questions? Kavas (talk) 22:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC) Kavas (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Current wording seems neutral IMO. Student7 (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

But, the word is not properly defining the event as the town was under Turkish sovereignty before the start of the war. Kavas (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I know you think they are the same, but do you mean Ottoman sovereignty? Student7 (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Redlinks to Güvercin Ada page

I have edited this page very recently, and I have added (red) links to a non-existent page concerning Güvercin Ada. This is because I intend to create a page concerning Güvercin Ada very shortly. It will be greatly appreciated if I can receive the support of fellow contributors and I invite you to edit it once it is created, if you are interested in the article.

Thank you, Coderenius (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kuşadası. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110515204813/http://www.artofilo.info/filecat/filecat_downloader.php?id=0008 to http://www.artofilo.info/filecat/filecat_downloader.php?id=0008
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725163855/http://en.kusadasi.bel.tr/?menuid=kat_detay&katid=11 to http://en.kusadasi.bel.tr/?menuid=kat_detay&katid=11

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuşadası. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181319/http://www.haberkapisi.com/haber/kusadasinda-kurtulus-coskusu-205348.htm to http://www.haberkapisi.com/haber/kusadasinda-kurtulus-coskusu-205348.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.webhatti.net/forum/konu/2010-fanta-genclik-festivali-takvimi-ve-reklam-filmi.590971/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)