Talk:Krabi province

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic Sources modified on Krabi Province

What is wrong with links to external sites with relevant photos? Especially if the Wiki article doesn't include any photos and that article is about an area known for it's scenic beauty.

The official Thai tourism website is OK but not so good that other sites with good additional resources should be ignored.

The external link "Golden Jubilee Network province guide" seems pointless. The site contains no information!

Almost all external links added here have very few additional info to what is in the TAT website, but are very commercial instead. Then it gets difficult to say which is allowed and which not - and as Wikipedia is not a weblink directory less is better than too many. The "Golden Jubilee Network" is currently empty, that's right, but that's because the webmaster there seems incompetent. However at the time of originally writing this article it contained very good stuff, and that was used as source for writing the article. I have however now added the link to commons, our own photo repository. andy 13:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Edits of User:Chompooh edit

Todax I reverted the edits of User:Chompooh done on 11. February 2008 because of suspected copyvio. I found parts of his edits on a certain webpage (http://www.krabi-hotels.com/info/people.htm). --hdamm (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Sources modified on Krabi Province edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Krabi Province. I managed to add archive links to 2 sources, out of the total 2 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.

Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{cbignore}} to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.

Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply