Talk:Kinglake, Victoria

Australia: Places / Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kinglake, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Raspberry Farm edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The text about the farm reads like an advertisement - not an encyclopeadic entry. I would like to delete it and add more factual information about Kinglake. Any comments? Eanuts 02:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some info re. the rebuilding of Kinglake? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kinglake having been so badly affected by the Black Saturday fire, it would be good to have some info about its rebuilding. Boscaswell (talk) 12:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinglake, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514070857/http://rotaryclubkinglakeranges.com.au/ to http://www.rotaryclubkinglakeranges.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic